New engine

[Feliks]

return to review..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoiBCDRjza4

Only one part of the multi-cylinder H engine can be seen on my animation. As you can see from the history, it can be 24 cylinders .. the order of ignition can also be seen in wikipedia .. If we properly think, the customs of the main cylinder system from Felix Roller, may not have ANY ONE SCREW to twisting ..



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H_engine



Formel 1 too :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Racing_Motors

https://rafaelschelb.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/60s-h16/



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycoming_H-2470

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Monarch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_XH-3130



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Eagle_(1944)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_Sabre

Andrew

[Feliks]

Here, even about new methods of converting heat into electrical current ... he writes about the temperature difference of 100 degrees Celjus ..

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep46211

Andrew

[Merlyn]

All that formulae is all ok Andrew but where is PV/ T = C?

[swarakulkarni]

Tongues in motors way of estimation of the measure of the mechanical steed.

Every motor claims constant parameters about distinct, like :

The whole of latency mass, entirety idleness springs, chains , valves, etc.

Each model of motor has these parameters precisely the SAME !!

Also, if for instance, we need it without burden for 4000 RPM, at the same time, we need precisely the SAME pull.

It is standard my thought: Pull Meter.

Way of estimation Torque:

The vehicle is stopped!!

We have running motor out of gear RPM.

We need just same drive great RPM meter

Next, we push and press I electronic meter switch "estimation"

Next, we should push the throttle in FULL.

Motor go to eg 5000 RPM.

Electronic estimation TIME with uncommon Delicate, to what extent motor going estimation period 3000 rpm to 4000 rpm. This TIME is the comparable pull of motor.

Little power - long time, ordinary power - a brief time

Electrical Engineering

[Merlyn]

Hereby it would appear to me that we have a Felix ( Andrew ) look a like character.
Could it be a relation, has Felix moved or has he resurfaced incognito?
On reflection however the writing style would appear different and the article is not supported by in depth " working " diagrams.
This is definately one for Felix I feel so I would appeal to his hull down attitude and plot a reciprocal course to enable him to deal with this subject in his usual specialist way.
Never seen a lecky motor with valves but I will not wish to pre- empt. Felix at this stage.

[Feliks]

Feliks-Tański engine animation video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoiBCDRjza4


Andrew

[Feliks]

Well, here is the way to create a vacuum - different in my Red Baron Windmill ... but now the first Newcomen steam engine called atmospheric, has an inaccurate name .Because actually it is a vacuum-driven engine, which gives condensed water vapor underneath the piston. In my case, this underpressure - it receives differently, from the wings put up in the wind and brought on to entrust the earth through a pipe with a large cross-section. And on the surface of the earth such a motor with pistons driving generators .. It is the most effective way, because virtually thanks to good piston sealing, vacuum we will not lose any losses .. thanks to this the efficiency will be high and no moving element can be seen in principle, except the rotating axis of the generator ... ..
That is why it is worth knowing the history of technology, because it contributes to the creation of new inventions.
here more about this Newcomen engine. , which may be useful to my Windmill Red Baron ... and we will have an efficient motor with a piston seal class, used to produce electricity from the wind ...
Well, it is definitely not a heat engine .. so talking about temperatures is pointless.:smokin:



http://www.technology.niagarac.on.ca/pe ... lXIj_bbyGg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcomen_ ... ric_engine


Andrew

[Merlyn]

But will it draw 29-92 HG Andrew?

[Feliks]

But will it draw 29-92 HG Andrew?

I would love to draw, It would be very nice .. Merlyn, but my Miastenia Gravis, it bothers me a little with this my double vision ... But this double vision is sometimes good ... if I get my pension, I see twice as much as it really is ...
but I am hopeful, because it is supposed to be a cure for her, new ...
https://myastheniagravisnews.com/2018/0 ... -increase/

But there are still some pictures ... for example, such as a blower connected to the venturi from a Venturi nozzle on the ship, it could drive the propeller right away.





Andrew

[Merlyn]

Concerning the draw I mentioned Andrew I actually referred to the inches of Mercury drawn by the vacuum created.
The scale commences at 0 at atmospheric pressure ( i.e. 14-7 ) going up to a perfect vacuum of 29-92HG,
It's the pressure of a column of Mercury exerts one inch high at atmospheric pressure and correct temperature readings.
That rooters type blower I see has the lock device fitted to prevent accidental turning movements occurring when working on it.
As a boy I well remember tapping out each and every one of those blind tapped holes to ensure each one was a clear thread and did not bottom out.
Hours and hours akin to the lower turbine casings tapping.
Sorry to hear you still have problems with your peepers, the only good side of this methinks would be in counting ones money.
Hell of a shaft angle on your design depicted?
Permanently on the plane design?
So keep doubling up on the loot and make sure the vacuum calculations are correct to stop your design running the wrong way.
I.e., suck don't blow theory here applies.
Ps,
Still haven't ever had a big "M " to date!

[Feliks]

Concerning the draw I mentioned Andrew I actually referred to the inches of Mercury drawn by the vacuum created.
The scale commences at 0 at atmospheric pressure ( i.e. 14-7 ) going up to a perfect vacuum of 29-92HG,
It's the pressure of a column of Mercury exerts one inch high at atmospheric pressure and correct temperature readings.
That rooters type blower I see has the lock device fitted to prevent accidental turning movements occurring when working on it.
As a boy I well remember tapping out each and every one of those blind tapped holes to ensure each one was a clear thread and did not bottom out.
Hours and hours akin to the lower turbine casings tapping.
Sorry to hear you still have problems with your peepers, the only good side of this methinks would be in counting ones money.
Hell of a shaft angle on your design depicted?
Permanently on the plane design?
So keep doubling up on the loot and make sure the vacuum calculations are correct to stop your design running the wrong way.
I.e., suck don't blow theory here applies.
Ps,
Still haven't ever had a big "M " to date!

I was not thinking about vacuum or pressure ... responding to your post, I remembered that you asked me once if I can make animated versions of the piston .. and I can not really ... .. but probably if I had this double money I would order someone who also solid works can ... maybe in two would pretty version come out ..

Well, for some time I "grew up" from the fact that you have to count everything first .. how I designed my second new4stroke prototype, I calculated, if I will have 100 HP, I will be happy .. but it turned out that it has 250 HP and I had to go back to bills, why it is so ... but everything agrees, although it did not look like it.Since then, she has started dealing with the observed practice, and not just counting ..And I think that I am doing well ... because you see, today nobody has drawn the P-V diagram of my engine ... so let me say why ... They can not easily calculate the volume of V ... and they do not ...

but let's get back to this proznia, which can not be easily counted, can not be counted ... and the windmill in my prototype modwło turns with incredible speed, the ball goes up, also perfectly efficiently .. so I think that such a large blower will also turn quite well. although for some it seems not.

here is my film with a primitive prototype, and the leaky windmill starts already at 25 km / h (15 miles / h) and it turns out great .. In every position .. Well, count the number of things that are vacuum ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyHTAlXLuXo&t=2s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPZWUQlhvDA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbav0O3E-S8


and, nevertheless, I decided to "blow" a little

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV2pTLhHBec


Andrew

[Feliks]

Well, because the whole is not important how much vacuum it does, and in this case easy to make wings even about 500 square meters .. In this case there will be many, many, many, but not high .. And what is more important a lot or height?

so the wind will blow at a speed of 16 meters / sec. , after reinforcement, these 9 times will be 144 meters / sec. that is half of the sound speed, that is, around 600 km / h. in other words, as much as they have speed and passenger planes. When they suddenly open at this speed, the door, then usually the passers-by who are closest to them are sucked

So I do not care about counting stars, just known practice ...

Andrew

[Feliks]

Even this pressure, if there is only 20 mm Hg, (20 cm water) it feels a little .. But such a ball, even by 200 cm tube, pulls up, as seen in the film .. And the ball falling down will have a specific energy. Besides, between high pressure and low atmospheric pressure, there is also a relatively small pressure difference, and can do a hurricane that has some energy ... sometimes they also show on films tv...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbav0O3E-S8

Andrew

[Feliks]

And finally, we have good access to this NASA CALCULATOR for flight profiles. No Java pieces are needed.
Well, you can see that there is a place on the air profile, where the speed of the air is 3 times higher than the speed of the general .. but this is only on a small part of the profile .. But there would be set turbine ..

https://www.new4stroke.com/wingspeed.jpg

here a link to this calculator and you can start learning aerodynamics yourself ... before the university is formed in this direction of aerodynamic energy.

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/foil3.html

Andrew

[Feliks]

But will it draw 29-92 HG Andrew?

So only in the German version of Wikipedia is a table about hurricanes about pressure in the core. but you can not use Google translator .. and you can clearly see the difference of 60 hPa (45 mm of mercury) can cause a hurricane 5 categories with a huge pressure force And this pressure difference has to overcome many kilometers from the shore to the center of a hurricane, which definitely inhibits it aerodynamic force .. If the difference were close to each other, the force would be even greater ,, Therefore, even a small pressure difference, but close to each other and with high volumetric capacity can do a lot of energy .. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurrikan#cite_note-14

But this time in English Wikipedia about the hurricane there is nothing about pressure, but it is a comparison to the Carnot engine ... ha, ha, probably someone's head got a Big Bang and Carnot uses God as a God https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_cyclone

Andrew